HOMEPAGE
- ACCUEIL ^ RETOUR ^ AUTRES RUBRIQUES : >>GLOBAL MANAGEMENT >>REMOTE COWORKINGS >>COOPERATIVE MOBILITIES >>LOCAL OUTPUTS |
Be.Bo.P (Au delà de toutes les barrières) COORDINATION DU PARTENARIAT Beyond Boundaries: People QUALITY CONTROL ![]() GLOBAL SURVEY and QUALITY CONTROL |
retour
à l'action européenne et internationale du Lycée
Ravel : en cliquant sur la bannière ERASMUS+ / pointez le blason
pour un accès direct à la propagande du projet dans le
website public LegendE+ SUIVI: SUPERVISION DE LA QUALITÉ / FOLLOW UP: QUALITY CONTROL ![]() R1& R2 transnational remote meeting and CP1 / CP2 + CP 3 First phase / CP4 + CP5 + CP6 R3 & R4 meetings Second Phase / CP 6 Third phase / R5 meeting and R6 final evaluation SELECT IN THE LIST ABOVE ABOVE THE CHECK POINT YOU WISH TO OPEN (not still possible: broken links) RELEVANCE TABLES AND EVALUATION ARE AVAILABLE IN THE "COOPERATIVE MOBILITIES" PART; NOTES ABOUT IMPACTS, SURVEYS AND FINANCIAL DATAS ARE EDITED HERE OR IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION NOTES SHARED ON THE NBE+ BLOGSPOT |
|
first phase /
QC1
QUALITY CONTROL and Project management Survey of the first pedagogic phase Efficience and Impacts R1 and CP1 feedback / CP2+3 checkpoints / R2 feedback |
|
TIMETABLE R1 (REMOTELY IMPLEMENTED AT THE BEGINNINGS OF THE FIRST SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024) : THE FIRST TRANSNATIONAL MEETING OF TEACHERS Results are given on this page but it is quickly described (as also the plenar committees implemented during the cooperative mobilities) in: THE PUBLIC WEBSITE LegendE+ THE FIRST CHECK POINT WAS DONE IN NOVEMBER, 2023 (CP1) - AND CP1 FEEDBACK WAS FINISHED BEFORE FEBRUARY, 2024 CHECK POINTS 2 & 3 WERE IMPLEMENTED IN MARCH THEN IN APRIL, 2024 AFTER THE COOPERATIVE MOBILITIES TO CESME AND BALDONE THE CP2+3 FEEDBACK WAS SUPPOSED TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE JUNE (IN ORDER TO HELP THE COORDINATOR TO BE ABLE TO WRITE THE PROGRESS REPORT) BUT IT WAS NECESSARY TO NOTE, AT THE TIME OF THE R2 MEETING (SECOND TEACHERS' SEMINAR AND CONCLUSIVE STAGE AFTER THE CP 2+3) THAT THE "BENEFICIARY MODULE" COMPLETION TOOL WAS NOT YET OPEN... THE REPORTING TASKS WERE THEREFORE POSTPONED TO FALL 2025 / see Budget Monitoring on the next page clicking the link: Second Phase |
![]() ![]() |
* R1 and CP1 / ISSUES and OUTCOMES * October 2023 - January 2024 |
|
Be.Bo.P TRANSNATIONAL MEETING R1 ![]() made on line the 14th of october, 2023 at the same time some videoconferences between learners were implemented for the ERASMUSDAYS ![]() RESULTS: Communication about the weak points of the application Agenda: first talks to fix C1 and C2 mobilities |
>CP1 FEEDBACK / QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PROJECT LEADERS Propaganda 67% of partner schools have already put certain educational products online but 33% are expected to do so within a short time; not surprising since the implementation of the project has only just begun 33% of partner schools have not yet published the start of cooperative action: this must be remedied as quickly as possible All the project holders are confident enough their own abilities to manage the numerical tools or think they could obtain some help at home in order to disseminate easily. The staffs know the project does exist, in every school (except in one case) cause information was given to colleagues and other employes and an Erasmus+ corner and (sometimes a few) Erasmus+ blackboard(s) were created for touching all the comunity and especially the students. Probably the reason why one partner is declaring information was not transmitted to all staff but only a part of is because of separated entities located far away each other but managed as an only one school 100% of project holders say they have informed a large number of learners, beyond just the target group in the strict sense 83% have informed all staff 50% have already communicated to families (2 schools did it by letters and online, 1 school organized a concrete meeting with parents): now mobilities are fixed so all the eachers may enter in a dialog with learners and parents to recruit participants |
CP1 / abstracts of the Quality Survey: dissemination | |
![]() ![]() |
|
CP1 / project management | |
![]() ^^ Teachers brainstorming ^^ and vv Turkish dancers vv (C1) ![]() |
>CP1 FEEDBACK / QUESTIONAIRE FOR PROJECT LEADERS Activities monitoring A7/A4/A5 are the main topics the partners are presumed to face with as the project is just beginning. Only the Turkish partner has already worked on the popular science website to be produced as the output corresponding the third specific objective of the second axis "Studying the crossing of borders of all sorts and the limits of knowledge.. Cesme is leader of WP3 module and will organize the first learners meeting. A4+A5 was seen in Italy, the other schools were mainly centered on A4 but planned to study also A5, especially in the framework of some activities made online (videoconferences) implemented by Lycée Ravel in the framework of the #Erasmusdays Concerning the modalities of selection of learners taking part in the partnership's activities and/or mobilities, the IC does consider answers given by contact persons are brief enough 'or even allusive) and will ask for more details (to be shared before C2 >CP1 DECISIONS mobility C1 posponed in march, 2024 mobility C2 fixed in april, 2024 mobility C3 / location and date to be chosen in the future (deadline C2) See other issues in the International Notes |
CP1 / abstracts of the Quality Survey: progression | |
![]() ![]() |
|
* CP2 + CP3 and R2: ISSUES and OUTCOMES * February-June 2024 |
|
CP2:
DEBRIEF OF C1 MOBILITY
INDICATIONS ABOUT THE QUALITY CONTROL AGENDA TASKS TARGETED: (details: click on the tab "Cooperative Mobilities" in the website called "LegendE+"): 95% -frontiers and refugees (examples: crisis in Syria and the Middle East, conflicts in the Ancient Times or in the modern era...) & cultural frontiers: foreigners/aliens >> TOPICS WERE PRESENTED BY SOME SLIDES AND PRESENTATIONS (SHARING ON THURSDAY) -in the context: local heritages and international tourism / sea and lands >> DONE AT THE EGE UNIVERSITY -festive exchanges (show of our local dances, common ballet on Turkish music or song) >> YES (MONDAY AND THURSDAY) -first video reports (a possible topic, a natural frontier: coastline) >> (instead: a theoric lesson) BUT SOME national products (ie French conclusive film made on Friday, interviews, Italian reports) ACTIVITIES DONE IN CONFORMITY TO THE GANTT CHART (this monitoring page) : 105% A5.1 Transnational training in Türkiye (C1): the external border of Europe, investigation of the Mediterranean, Mare Nostrum or limes >> DONE AT THE UNIVERSITY / and in the framewok of EXPLORATION WALKS WITH TURKISH GUIDES A7 Produce a mathematical tool (using the Python language) to measure the Earth's roundness, surface area and/or volume in a popular science website showing how the limits of our knowledge of the world have been pushed back>> A SPECIAL WEBSITE WAS CREATED AND SOME USERS ID SHARED A 11.1 Online and face-to-face training sessions by expert video maker >> not supposed to be implemented during C1 BUT DONE AT THE UNIVERSITY ![]() Find more information about the relevance in NBE+ in the section named "COOPERATIVE MOBILITIES" |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Brainstormings
during the Be.Bo.P COOPERATIVE MOBILITY C1 |
PLENAR
COMMITTEES OF TEACHERS AND PROJECT HOLDERS: two workshops were
implemented in the framework of C1 / SATISFACTION: one
questionaire was completed after the the mobility |
![]() |
|
>CP2 FEEDBACK /
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR 100% of people think that the ERASMUS+ C1 Çeşme program had a positive contribution to their personal development 100% were satisfied to visit another country and to take part in some intercultural exchanges 100% felt lucky meeting students from dufferent cultures 97% believed it is a positive fact to be added in their CV Did C1 meeting help people to make a new circle of
friends? Yes, 90% Did C1 meeting improve English and foreign languages abilities? Yes, 86% (14 % are not sure) Will C1 meeting have an impact of the future career of
participants. Yes, sure 35% / Yes, probably 24% (41% think it is not
the case) ABOUT QUALITY OF SUPPORT> The academic staff's approach to students was very good for 94% of answering persons ; 6% are undecided. The training seminars are good (21%) or excellent (62%) but, for a minority, the level is only: average (17%) Almost 100% of people did appreciate the workshops and think the activities were sufficient. PROBLEMS> Time management was good for 70%, correct for 30% ; the quality of the programme may sometimes create density and pressure. Some learners had some difficulty overcoming the language barrier (34%) |
PC1 & PC2 in Çeşme Brainstormings for the project holders: in addition of the workshop devoted to the WP3 delivrables, made with Mr Oguz Kapan, one plenar committee was implemented on Thursday the 7th.PC1 explanation about our priorities, reminder of the Quality Control modalities and issues by the IC, first leads for the changes to be done in the timeline and agenda [WP1] due to the decision not to organize more than two outing exits per school year; financial situation we must overcome making asap our progress report in order to be funded early enough toimplemen the mobilies planned during the next school year PC2 on Thursday the 8th of march Second plenar committee to fix the decisions [WP1]. >CP2 DECISIONS
Mobility C3 is fixed in Romania. Dates to be arranged
during C2 (october or november, 2024) See other issues in the International Notes ![]() |
CP3 / debrief of C2 Mobility | |
CP3: DEBRIEF OF C2 MOBILITY INDICATIONS ABOUT THE QUALITY CONTROL AGENDA TASKS TARGETED: (tab "Cooperative
Mobilities" in the website called "LegendE+"): 100%
-wars
and boundaries (Ukrainan refugees, other bad impacts of conflicts)& across the fontiers by cultural sharings>> INTERVIEWS ON THESE THEMES -local History : empires and frontiers>> VISITS OF CASTLES AND MUSEUM -training sessions by a video/photo expert>> MADE WITH LOUIS FABRIÈS -festive exchanges (Latvian dances to make together, a ballet to improve about our project's hymn)>> DANCE PARTY AT SCHOOL -first transnational footages>> MANY FILMING WORKSHOPS ACTIVITIES
DONE IN CONFORMITY TO THE GANTT CHART (monitoring pages in NBE+
website) : 100%
A5.2
Transnational training in Latvia (C2): borders and cleavages within
Europe (strategic issues)>> TOPIC WAS STUDIED AND PRESENTED IN
THE SHARES SLIDES AND FILMSA 11.1 Online and face-to-face training sessions by expert video maker & A 11.2 Training and supervision of transnational filmed surveys made in the framework of C2>> FIRST TRANSNATIONAL MOVIES WERE PRODUCED |
![]() |
CP2 + CP3 feedback | |
Brainstormings during the Be.Bo.P COOPERATIVE MOBILITY C2 PLENAR COMMITTEES OF TEACHERS AND PROJECT HOLDERS: three workshops SURVEY: one satisfaction questionnaire PC1, PC2 and PC3 in Baldone: |
![]() click to^^enlarge |
PC1 FOLLOW UP
PC2 QUALITY CONTROL
PC3 PEDAGOGIC MONITORING
WP2 (module 2 SUR LES FRONTIÈRES) LEARNING SESSIONS CENTERED ON BORDERS : in the classrooms, also in some remote coworkings, and in the collaborative workshops implemented during mobilities C1,C2, C3 and C5 WP3 (module 3 VERS L'INFINI ET AU DELÀ) PRODUCE A POPULAR SCIENCE WEBSITE: topic is the understanding of the world, the known and the unknown; the most important of deliverable output after the documentary movie WP4 (module 4 DANS TOUT LE ROYAUME) PRODUCE A DOCUMENTARY FILM: considering “climate refugges” among other subjects (transnational footage from C2 and in the following meetings, local interviews about migration to be shared in C4) WP5 (module 5 DANSER SUR UNE PETITE PLANÈTE) DANCING and LIVING TOGETHER: in order to produce a choregraphied transnational performance at the end of the partnership (and to share good times all along the project is ongoing) RESULTS IN THE RIGHT COLUMN See other issues in the International Notes Comments on the Satisfaction Questionaires: in
the Progress Report |
>CP3 DECISIONS
PC1 PC2 More
details were asked to the local teams to well undestand the selection
criteria they used to choose the students taking part in the
partnership
and especially people invited in the cooperative mobilities. The IC
asked for a best coherence between the declared planning and the
reports of activities transmitted to him. PC3 ![]() |
![]() |
TRANSNATIONAL MEETING R2 CP2+3 FEEDBACK |
![]() |
Update on people involved
inmobility: very numerous during phase 1 As a reminder, the commitments of the application are limited: 1 to 2 teachers per outing cooperative travel, therefore between 5 and 10 during the entire project 4 to 5 students, therefore 20 to 25 At a minimum, each partner must transport 5 adults and 20 learners, which was recalled by the Project Manager, in particular, in note BB12. But the evaluation of the application revealed an incentive to incorporate more participants if possible. In fact, the initial objective was doubled during the first localized cooperations, in the optimistic context of the launch of the project: we hoped to have 50 people travel per school (10 teachers and 40 students). France, for example, achieved through C1 and C2 trips: 6 executive mobilities (teachers, experts) and 22 learner mobilities The minimum level required for the entire cooperation by the joint application has already been reached by Lycée Ravel. |
![]() |
|
SEE
BELOW THE TOPICS IN TE FRAMEWORK OF THE TRANSNATIONAL
MEETING R2 CP2+3 FEEDBACK Budget crisis and solutions Most schools have spent their first tranche of grant and are now worried about it, despite repeated warnings from the international coordinator (note BB7 on the occasion of the first Quality Control point encouraging not to exceed the gauge of 5 to 6 learners without having verified the feasibility of a possible excess, a new call for caution formulated in BB8 - where the supposedly superior resources of the French coordinator were mentioned - then in BB9, which recalled that C3 mobility must in theory be financed from the budget allocated to WP2, or even: from the first tranche of 40% of the grant, paid at the start of 2024). The first decision taken by the International Coordinator to deal with the explosion in the cost of air transport was to implement the principle of a remote transnational R3 meeting. Then, we decided to end beyond the first year (and unless possible recourse to funding external to the Be.Bo.P partnership) the collaboration with the anticipated paid experts, for the video part as well as for the choreography. It is obvious that, as far as the Lycée Ravel is concerned at least, it is not possible to maintain large numbers of outgoing mobilities: both the number of learners and that of staff supervising these activities will have to be adjusted. |
![]() |
CP3 / abstracts of the Satisfaction Questionnaire after C2 | |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Writing and directing a
documentary (WP4) The expected film is not of professional quality. In the worst case, it can be completed without expertise outside of that of the learners and teachers involved in the project (in addition, resources exist within the ILARGIA League to help with the editing of the final product). Its subject must be freely determined: it is not necessarily a question of insisting on political borders (which is the case in the WP2 module). Whatever the initial idea formulated and retained by the students, and validated by the teachers, the documentary must, to be faithful to the purpose of the application, evoke (or deal with) the problem of climate refugees, and evoke (or deal with ) the theme of migration (through the project's study travels, in particular). But there is no question of forcing learners to exclusively report on the partnership. Sharing contents in an international framework Unsurprisingly, since this problem had been anticipated by the Project Manager (note BB8 indicating that at least two course sessions would be necessary to present all the expected productions) it did not turn out to be very practical (nor frankly useful in the framework of transnational cooperations) that each school shows more than a glimpse of the research carried out at home. Especially since valid productions are posted online in LegendE+ To limit the time allocated upstream of C2 and for the entire duration of the partnership, each school limits itself to a partial presentation of 10 to 15 minutes of its activities clean (note BB11) |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
R2 / impacts | |
TRANSNATIONAL MEETING R2 the 31st of MAY 2024 VIDEO CONFERENCE AGENDA 0 reminder of CP2+3 "feedback" (see here, above) I - pending questions support by the ILARGIA league evolution of our popular science website propaganda and dissemination yours answers (Feedback +IC16): missing data or additional
information requested II - outlook for year 2: online suggestion box contents of C3 and C4 cooperation educational priorities budget strategies III - questions for the interim report |
![]() |
to be followed: abstracts of the Satisfaction Questionnaire after C3 | |
LE JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA PREMIÈRE PHASE EST DISPONIBLE EN LIGNE (DANS LE BLOG NBE+) et peut être téléchargé ici ![]() YOU CAN DOWNLOAD FROM HERE THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION NOTES OR FIND THE CONTENTS ONLINE THANKS TO THE NBE+ BLOG (clicking the wolf'head >>) TASKS LIST IS AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE (FOLLOW UP tab) |
![]() UNDER CONSTRUCTION Quality Control at the fourth CHECK POINT (made in december 2024 after the transnational remote meeting R2 and the Plenar Comittee of Project Holders / PC implemented during C3 mobility) >> VOIR LA PAGE SUIVANTE / Quality Control: phase 2 SUIVI BUDGÉTAIRE DE LA PÉRIODE ET DU PREMIER TRIMESTRE 2024-2025 DÉCRIT PLUS LOIN |